 |
|
| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
Momodou
Denmark
11734 Posts |
 Posted - 04 Aug 2006 : 21:03:42
|
NADD’s Letter to UDP/NRP Alliance
ON THE PROPOSAL OF THE UDP/NRP ALLIANCE
Your memorandum dated 27th July 2006 on the above mentioned subject has been received. The members of the Executive Committee of NADD are fully conscious of the clarion call of the Gambian people for unity transcending party, tribal, regional and other affiliations.
Infact, NADD was founded precisely to make it impossible for the regime to exploit such differences to win the Presidential election. You would recall that the discussion regarding the selection of a flag bearer started in earnest a long time ago. When the first method of reaching a consensus failed a second method was put in place. If this failed any party could have recommended for the Chairmen, Chairwomen and Youth Leaders of the parties in each village or ward to be consulted to do the selection.
A congress of that nature could have been the starting point of NADD’s campaign. This would have undoubtedly been a very massive event following the visit of President Obasanjo who came purposefully to mediate between NADD and the APRC government. Had such development taken place we would not have been racing against time.
Our present predicament therefore is a by product of our division. Needless to say, your discussion with Halifa Sallah was designed to enable you to share opinion on the state of the country and the way forward. We have gathered that the discussion eventually led to proposals to be considered before negotiation could be initiated.
The NADD Executive fully endorsed the confidentiality which characterized the discussion but was later taken aback when Mr. Hamat Bah stated in categorical terms that the UDP/NRP Alliance will never negotiate on the basis of equality with other political parties. He claimed that negotiation was on, that the only thing delaying the negotiation is NADD’s insistence for the sharing of a cake that is not baked. This polluted the atmosphere surrounding the discussion compelling Halifa Sallah to issue a statement to dismiss Mr. Bah’s claim that negotiations were on and that it was stalled because of differences on the issue of sharing posts. Now that the necessary clarification is made NADD is willing to consider any proposal.
Evaluation Of Your Proposals
Your first proposal is for the UDP/NRP Alliance to be expanded to include NADD. The position of the NADD Executive is unequivocal. The executive members are convinced that after the second round of voting was eliminated no opposition party or its leader could be promoted to win an election on the basis of its individual strength. NADD wants the UDP/NRP Alliance to take note of the current state of their parties.
It wishes to go on record to affirm that NDAM, NRP, PDOIS, PPP and UDP are still registered parties in the country; that the registration of NADD was not designed to kill other political parties and it has not killed other political parties. That is why the UDP/NRP Executive members who were in NADD could go back to their original parties as fast as they could write their signatures. The Executive Committee wishes to reiterate that all the other Executive Committee members of NADD decided to create this umbrella party and register it so as to galvanize the collective strength of the opposition parties to remove the present regime and then give life to each party to contest the next following election on equal footing on the basis of its own merit and that of its candidate.
The creation of NADD cultivated a sense of common ownership that no alliance around a single party can create. The Executive Committee further observes that a UDP/NRP/NADD Alliance will not be recognized in law. Any candidate would have to be under UDP NRP or NADD ticket. Hence your proposal is considered to take NADD back to square one when the opposition parties were considering whether to contest the election under an umbrella party or under the leadership of one of the existing parties.
It is therefore maintained that the NADD arrangement provides the best opportunity for collective ownership of the candidate and the campaign process to guarantee victory. This is the first point.
Secondly, you propose that the new alliance adopts a single flagbearer to contest the 2006 presidential election. The Executive Committee of NADD considers the proposal to be incomplete. It would like to know how the selection is to be conducted. NADD had established a selection process based on consensus or voting by party chairmen, chairwomen and youth leaders. If no mechanism is proposed there is no way the NADD Executive can make a decision on this matter.
Thirdly, you propose that the activities of the election be governed by the present constitution. The Executive Committee does not understand what this means. The constitution has been amended so many times that it gives the president monarchical powers. A President now rules without term limit. The President can appoint and dismiss the Chiefs; dismiss the members of the IEC and can even dissolve the National Assembly. Are you implying that the flagbearer should not give commitment on a political platform not to seek a second mandate or support another candidate in the next following election? Should we not have a transitional arrangement to curtail the monarchical powers of the presidency which should be propagated on our political platforms? Should the flag bearer not be urged to give commitment in public to combat and uproot such powers that legitimize impunity?
This is the corner stone of NADD’s attempt to put an end to self perpetuating rule. The NADD Executive strongly maintains that this platform of putting an end to self perpetuating rule and impunity is the best weapon the opposition has in winning popular support. This is one platform it has been propagating to the wide approval of the electorate. How to reverse this process without being accused of being power hungry is a dilemma we need to give careful consideration to.
Your fourth proposal is for the alliance to limit itself to regime change and that the issue of portfolios be shelved. The NADD Executive wishes to convey that the issue of creating a cabinet based on shared responsibility by member parties should not be mistaken to be an attempt to share the cake of power. NADD aims to keep the opposition parties alive and facilitate a healthy multiparty system after a five year transition by implementing the policy of collective leadership.
Nothing is explained why such a general undertaking to operate a government based on the participation of all member parties and representatives of civil society should be shelved. The NADD Executive maintains that the first five years after Jammeh, should be a transition period to genuine democratic and constitutional rule. All the basic rectification programmes that should be made should be known to the people, so that no leader will be able to betray their aspirations without being challenged and removed in the first five years. It stands to reason that if a future president, elected on the basis of merit is expected to accept a two term limit why should the first president of a post Jammeh government not accept one term to build the culture of establishing term limits for the presidency?
The fifth point is for a National Constitutional Review Conference to be the held within a period of three months after the National Assembly elections. In our view, the review of a constitution should be done through civic education programmes designed to enable the people to know what is in the constitution followed by a nation wide debate on the need for amendments through the auspices of a constitutional review commission. This is part of the NADD programme of action.
Your sixth point is that the recommendations of a national constitutional conference will be subjected to a referendum and then presented to the National Assembly. The Executive Committee of NADD considers such a proposal to be of a general nature. No issue has been raised. It is not clear whether the recommendations will be transformed into a bill that would require the approval of the National Assembly before a referendum. We don’t know what recommendations will touch on the entrenched clauses to warrant a referendum. Hence there is no point to make a decision on.
To conclude, allow us to indicate that the best way forward for any party which thinks that it has the might to remove the APRC regime is to proceed to do so and ask other parties to support its programme. However if all opposition parties are convinced that an alliance is the best instrument to remove the present regime then the NADD arrangement appears to have earned popular appeal. The flagbearer of NADD has stated in no uncertain term that he will be ready to vacate the seat in favour of anyone who can be a unifying factor of all those who are dissatisfied with the existing regime.
The NADD Executive therefore calls on the UDP/NRP Alliance to do a critique of the NADD MOU and make recommendations on what to delete to make it acceptable to them. The NADD Executive will review any recommendation with objectivity.
While anticipating a swift and practical response,
We remain
Yours in the service of the Nation.
Halifa Sallah
For the NADD Executive.
Source: Foroyaa Newspaper Burning Issue
Issue No. 61/2006, 4-6 August, 2006
|
|
|
BambaLaye
USA
100 Posts |
Posted - 04 Aug 2006 : 22:00:46
|
Allahu Akbar!
I AM PROUD TO BE BEHIND NADD 110%!!
It is absolutely clear, there cannot be a better platform for the much needed total overhaul of the rotten systen we have in a "delegative democracy" as seen in today's Gambia. |
|
 |
|
|
Dalton1
3485 Posts |
Posted - 05 Aug 2006 : 00:16:13
|
quote:
Originally posted by BambaLaye
Allahu Akbar!
I AM PROUD TO BE BEHIND NADD 110%!!
It is absolutely clear, there cannot be a better platform for the much needed total overhaul of the rotten systen we have in a "delegative democracy" as seen in today's Gambia.
Include me in the package. Nadd is the unity of the union, that will no doubt rescue Gambians. Whether new alliance will be called Nadd, Nadd/UDP/NRP , that equals Ndam plus ppp plus Pdois plus UDP plus NRP. In short this is Nadd. |
"There is no god but Allah (SWT); and Muhammad (SAW)is His last messenger." shahadah. Fear & Worship Allah (SWT) Alone! (:
|
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
|
|
| Bantaba in Cyberspace |
© 2005-2024 Nijii |
|
|
|
Topic Locked
