Bantaba in Cyberspace
Bantaba in Cyberspace
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ | Invite a friend
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Politics Forum
 Politics: Gambian politics
 Justice F. Achibonga speaks.
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
| More
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

toubab1020



12306 Posts

Posted - 29 Jun 2023 :  21:21:17  Show Profile Send toubab1020 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
COMMENT:
It would be very interesting if there were to be an in depth enquiry into the circumstances of why this case ever reached the Court System,
something OBVIOUSLY went badly wrong .
++++++++++

===========
https://foroyaa.net/court-acquits-purported-serial-rapist-on-20-criminal-charges/
===========


By Kemeseng Sanneh (KEXX) on June 29, 2023

Ismaila Ndong,, a taxi driver was charged with six (6) counts of rape, thirteen (13) counts of robbery and one (1) count of indecent assault. He denied all the charges and the prosecution were called upon by the court to open their case, but at the end of the case, Ndong made a ‘no case to answer’ submission with the claim that the prosecution, despite the numerous charges, failed to establish a case against him. He pleaded that his innocence was not shaken.


According to the prosecution’s case, Ndong engaged the girls in sexual acts intentionally and under coercive circumstances on different dates. The prosecution also alleged that he took valuables from the same girls/ladies such as mobile phones, cash, finger rings, wrist bangles, and other materials on different dates.

Justice Achibonga said the prosecution had failed to provide evidence linking Ndong to the alleged sexual act on the alleged victims. He pointed out that the prosecution failed to suggest, even remotely, that Ndong engaged in sexual acts with any of the victims. The Judge held that even the evidence of the alleged victims did not support the allegation that Ndong engaged them in a sexual act. Also, he held that the prosecution had failed to adduce any evidence to suggest that Ndong stole from the victims. He added that stealing is an essential ingredient in a charge of robbery. In short, the Judge held that the prosecution failed to prove the elements of the crimes alleged and therefore, the court would not call on Ndong to open his defence.

"Simple is good" & I strongly dislike politics. You cannot defend the indefensible.
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
| More
Jump To:
Bantaba in Cyberspace © 2005-2024 Nijii Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.06 seconds. User Policy, Privacy & Disclaimer | Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.06