 |
|
| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
mbay
Germany
1007 Posts |
 Posted - 15 Dec 2008 : 16:28:12
|
As everything is coming to the light.A Members of the separating US Government, including ex Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld, are jointly responsible after a report of the US senate for the violations of human rights in the prison of Abu Ghraib and other US arrest camps such as Guantanamo.
In the report of the military committee of the senate published in Washington on the earlier American cross-examining methods are criticized sharply.
“The committee report describes the inexcusable connection between the abusing cross-examining techniques of our enemies… and the cross-examining methods for prisoners in US safekeeping”, the republican senator John McCain stressed which published the study together with the democratic senator Carl Levin .
“This politics are wrong and may never repeat itself”. Brutal cross-examining techniques belonged to the training programme with the US military, so that soldiers were prepared for the methods of the enemies of Americas; The methods of this didactic program were meant however never also in American name to be used stressed Levin.
The report contradicts the government of President G W. Bush, which had always denied a connection of his “war against the terror” with the scandalous procedures in Abu Ghraib. Spectacular amateur pictures of abusing and degradation of Iraqi prisoners had released 2004 world-wide indignation. Rumsfeld contributed, is called 2002 with the permission of “aggressive cross-examining techniques” with presumed terrorists in the US camp Guantanamo to later abusing it in the report. Although the permission of the human right-adverse methods was recalled by the Pentagon already six weeks later, it continued to contribute in the Iraq and Afghanistan to the fact that prisoners were abused.
Rumsfelds politics was a “direct cause of the prisoner abusing in Guantanamo” and a contribution to the abusing in Afghanistan and in the Iraq, so the non-partisan report. “Abusing of prisoner at the end of 2003 (in Abu Ghraib) was not simply the result of arbitrarily acting soldiers.” Cross-examining techniques such as sleep withdrawal, an undressing of the prisoners or the intimidating use of dogs are phenomena, which were only used after their authorized employment in Afghanistan and Guantanamo then also elsewhere.
The war in the Iraq And the consequences. Now even the prominent representatives of US Neoconservative grant now glaring errors.
„I would have never believed that we would be snafu so badly “-says Richard Perle a director of ex advisor committee to Defence Policy board, Strong Tobak! Perle, beside Douglas Feith and the former vice-Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz as prominent representatives „of the Neocons “, to Pentagon and advisors of president George W. Bush supported the attack on the Iraq 2003 considerably. Feith sees the war likewise critical after five years duration. „We paid a terrible price, but not because of the war as such, but because it ran so badly. “ Feith fears: „And today neither North Korea nor Iran believes that our diplomacy is flanked by reliable threats. “ The responsibility for the war points Wolfowitz however from himself: „Contrary to what you read everywhere, I was not the wire-puller. “ Also Perle which today like Wolfowitz works in the conservative American Enterprise of institutes expresses themselves similarly. „We did not have real influence, although I would have very much wished myself that. Pieces of advice were gladly ignored. “
The Secretary of Defense at that time Donald Rumsfeld made the decisions. Wolfowitz expressed himself in addition critically over the situation estimate in the Iraq before the war: „We did not know the enemy. “Perle enumerated a further Fiasco: „We wanted to be emancipator, however after five, six month’s crew power we became a targeted. “Well it is like Mary Go'Round and no one should know better than you!
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
|
|
| Bantaba in Cyberspace |
© 2005-2024 Nijii |
 |
|
|
Topic Locked
