Bantaba in Cyberspace
Bantaba in Cyberspace
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ | Invite a friend
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Politics Forum
 Politics: Gambian politics
 PDOIS Must Not Have Missed Raleigh - By Militant
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
| More
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

kobo



United Kingdom
7765 Posts

Posted - 06 Jun 2013 :  20:36:02  Show Profile Send kobo a Private Message
1. RELATED BANTABA TOPIC: The Raleigh Convention


THE DISCOURSE HAS TOOK A NEW DIMENSION WITH THIS CRITICAL ARTICLE (COMMENTS & OPINION) FROM A PDOIS STALWART MILITANT AND DIASPORA PILLAR (USA LEADER). WHAT A BEAUTY FOR "EVERYONE RIGHT OF OPINION"; AGREE OR TO DISAGREE UNDER NORMS OF "DEMOCRACY" AND "FREEDOM OF SPEECH"

2. MAAFANTA.COM NEWS;

PDOIS Must Not Have Missed Raleigh by Modou Nyang

"The absence of PDOIS at the Raleigh conference in the weekend of 17th to 19th of May to engage interested Gambians on the way out of the political mess our country is embroiled into was a mistake that must not have happened. PDOIS (People’s Democratic Organization for Independence and Socialism), is the one party in the Gambia that since its emergence on our country’s political scene, that have been on the forefront of every single happening of national concern and struggle for the freedom and development of our people. As a result, abstaining to confer with fellow citizens notwithstanding the differences of views and opinions on the modalities to the roadmap for the liberation of our country may be, is not the PDOIS way and must not be repeated. PDOIS never shies away from engaging in the discourse for the way forward for our country and people, singularly because of its clarity of vision and mission to the path to salvage and put our country on the road to development. Therefore, missing out in Raleigh denied the party the chance and opportunity to yet again put forth its views before an interested party....."

More full information

3. SAME ARTICLE FEATURED BY KIBAARO NEWS AS;

4. MORE RELATED MAAFANTA NEWS;

Edited by - kobo on 07 Jun 2013 19:30:08

dbaldeh

USA
934 Posts

Posted - 06 Jun 2013 :  21:25:46  Show Profile  Visit dbaldeh's Homepage Send dbaldeh a Private Message
I absolutely agree with Mr. Nyang for the most part on the substance of his article. Many are with the opinion that Halifa would have been in a better position to articulate the objectives of the group of six along side Mr. Darboe. If anything, it was a missed opportunity to give a clear explanation of the objectives of the group of six. Having them all on the same platform would have lend more credibility to the group of six...

Although noted by many that this was a rare public disagreement with PDOIS leadership... This is what many people continue to encourage for leaders of political parties to embrace... They should encourage more of their younger militants to come forward and speak openly about their opinion on policies...

Am sure without fear of lashing (just kidding)the DEST Officer who I have a lot of respect for would have expressed his views differently as well... Kudos NYang and I hope you don't any response from HALIFA... because your take is genuine and commendable...

Baldeh,
"Be the change you want to see in the world" Ghandi
Visit http://www.gainako.com for your daily news and politics
Go to Top of Page

kobo



United Kingdom
7765 Posts

Posted - 06 Jun 2013 :  22:02:18  Show Profile Send kobo a Private Message
dBaldeh

1. We have unfinished business on your comments above addressed to me; which I am coming very soon to deal with them

2. With due respect to Modou Nyang's opinions (as every one is entitle to that), he made his personal feelings known and disappointment on his party. For the records another PDOIS pillar, stalwart militant and Modou Nyang's comrade Pa Samba Jow (coach) endorsed "100% behind Modou Nyang" in here gambia-l. PDOIS leadership will handle that with them; in public domain and interest of transparency

3. As most of the issues brought up by Modou Nyang in his article are for PDOIS to duel with other opposition parties and challenged to counter them, the statement by PDOIS that: “The Central Committee therefore resolved that it was not prudent to be a part of a brainstorming exercise on the way forward since it had the potential of exposing divisions rather than bridging the strategic and tactical divides on the way forward. ” can be considered as valid reason(s) ”WHY PDOIS WAS NOT IN RALEIGH” that are incontrovertible

4. It is very tricky to endorse or "agree" that it was "O.K" for PDOIS absence (in opinion poll here) but its (PDOIS) absence had not undermine success of the conference. In my opinion; it wasn't "O.K" at all and beyond our expectation but I fully endorse ALL PDOIS reasons for absence as genuine and valid (without any damage done to success of conference)! In addition they are only opposition party that tabled in public domain a proper framing structure to marry/consolidate all dissidents; especially diaspora efforts with opposition parties on the ground; by clarifying its position, sound resolutions on way forward, strategies and tactics against incumbent. Don't you agree dBaldeh

Edited by - kobo on 07 Jun 2013 05:22:10
Go to Top of Page

dbaldeh

USA
934 Posts

Posted - 06 Jun 2013 :  22:31:43  Show Profile  Visit dbaldeh's Homepage Send dbaldeh a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by kobo

dBaldeh

1. We have unfinished business on your comments above addressed to me; which I am coming very soon to deal with them

2. With due respect to Modou Nyang's opinions (as every one is entitle to that), he made his personal feelings known and disappointment on his party. PDOIS will handle that with him.

3. As most of the issues brought up by Modou Nyang in his article are for PDOIS to duel with other opposition parties and challenged to counter them, the statement by PDOIS that: “The Central Committee therefore resolved that it was not prudent to be a part of a brainstorming exercise on the way forward since it had the potential of exposing divisions rather than bridging the strategic and tactical divides on the way forward. ” can be considered as valid reason(s) ”WHY PDOIS WAS NOT IN RALEIGH” that are incontrovertible

4. It is very tricky to endorse or "agree" that it was "O.K" for PDOIS absence (in opinion poll here) but its (PDOIS) absence had not undermine success of the conference. In addition they are only opposition party that tabled in public domain a proper framing structure to marry/consolidate all dissidents; especially diaspora efforts with opposition parties on the ground; by clarifying its position, sound resolutions on way forward, strategies and tactics against incumbent. Don't you agree dBaldeh



Kobo, I find it difficult to understand how you reason sometimes.... Many times I find your postings very intelligent but occasionally I find you wanting and shallow in your reasoning.... Can you for GOD Sake look beyond PDOIS...

Nobody said that the PDOIS absence in Raleigh undermines the process.. The central argument is that it was a missed Opportunity to be part of something bigger than them and for the interest of the nation... Your opinion polls here may not be objective because it is a friendly territory for PDOIS.. (my opinion)...

I don't agree that PDOIS is the only Party with sound ideas on clarifying efforts of the opposition... Since Halifa is designated or acts as the spokesperson for the group of six I said he would have been in a better position to explain the position of the group of six... Can I make myself clearer than this... I also agree that Halifa is probably a better communicator than most of the leaders BUT please separate Halifa the person from PDOIS for once....

Kobo, I wish that PDOIS will do away with this theme..

“The Central Committee therefore resolved that it was not prudent to be a part of a brainstorming exercise on the way forward since it had the potential of exposing divisions rather than bridging the strategic and tactical divides on the way forward. ” can be considered as valid reason(s) ”WHY PDOIS WAS NOT IN RALEIGH” that are incontrovertible"

That as a nation in trying times we must engage in brainstorming without conditions... That they shouldn't care more about their individual images and party image to the public at the detriment of the nation... Every Gambian of sound mind is aware there is disagreement and mistrust within the opposition, so why the hell are they so worried about a meeting exposing differences that everyone already knows... You see anything wrong with this picture????

This central committee needs to be dissolved or expanded to include people with differing opinions and not like minded people... That's a club not a political party that aspires to lead a nation... LOL do I have to think like Halifa and Sidia to become a member of PDOIS????

Baldeh,
"Be the change you want to see in the world" Ghandi
Visit http://www.gainako.com for your daily news and politics

Edited by - dbaldeh on 06 Jun 2013 22:35:01
Go to Top of Page

kobo



United Kingdom
7765 Posts

Posted - 07 Jun 2013 :  00:05:29  Show Profile Send kobo a Private Message
Originally posted by dbaldeh


Kobo, I find it difficult to understand how you reason sometimes.... Many times I find your postings very intelligent but occasionally I find you wanting and shallow in your reasoning.... Can you for GOD Sake look beyond PDOIS...

I HAD SAME PROBLEM WITH YOU? TO BE SPECIFIC YOUR COMMENTS ARE LACKING COHERENCE AND I DECIDED TO SHELVE THEM FOR AWHILE; IN ORDER TO CLEARLY DEAL WITH THEM POINT BY POINT AND/OR LINE BY LINE LATER (AS TIME PERMITS). IF I DON'T SEPARATE THEM SENTENCE BY SENTENCE I DON'T SEE ANY POINT(S) OR UNDERSTAND YOUR LINE OF THOUGHTS

Nobody said that the PDOIS absence in Raleigh undermines the process.. The central argument is that it was a missed Opportunity to be part of something bigger than them and for the interest of the nation...

DID PDOIS DISAPPROVE OR DISMISS ANYTHING ON THE RALEIGH CONFERENCE AND NOT BEING "SOMETHING BIGGER THAN THEM AND FOR THE INTEREST OF THE NATION"? HAVE PDOIS NOT FOLLOWED PROTOCOL, NOT FORMALLY RESPONDED AND NOT TENDERED CLEAR-CUT SPECIFIC RESOLUTIONS OF THE PARTY AND AVOIDED BICKERING AND BLAME GAME? WHAT IS THE "MISSED OPPORTUNITY" THEN

Your opinion polls here may not be objective because it is a friendly territory for PDOIS.. (my opinion)...

THAT'S NOT A "FAIR" COMMENT FOR ADMIN. AND DISAPPOINTED COMING FROM YOU? HOW CAN THAT BE? ITS OPEN DOOR POLICY AND ONLY FEW ARE INTERESTED TO PARTICIPATE. YOU CAN SEE THAT 1/2 = 7 (4/3) AND 2/2 = 6 (3/3) VOTES SO FAR

I don't agree that PDOIS is the only Party with sound ideas on clarifying efforts of the opposition...

- WHO MADE THAT CLAIM "that PDOIS is the only Party with sound ideas on clarifying efforts of the opposition"?

- WHAT I STATED IS THAT PDOIS "are only opposition party that tabled in public domain a proper framing structure to marry/consolidate all dissidents; especially diaspora efforts with opposition parties on the ground; by clarifying its position, sound resolutions on way forward, strategies and tactics against incumbent. "

- REFER ME UDP, NRP, GMC, PPP OR GPDP PROPOSALS ON RALEIGH CONFERENCE OR ANYTHING PUT ON TABLE (AVAILABLE IN PUBLIC DORMAIN); CLEAR-CUT, SPECIFIC AND ATTAINABLE; WELL DOCUMENTED AND ORGANISED AS PDOIS


Since Halifa is designated or acts as the spokesperson for the group of six I said he would have been in a better position to explain the position of the group of six... Can I make myself clearer than this... I also agree that Halifa is probably a better communicator than most of the leaders BUT please separate Halifa the person from PDOIS for once....

- PLEASE ADDRESS "PDOIS as a party? Try by all means not to directly accuse, offend or mention the persona of Halifa Sallah; i.e. not to personalise it!

- PDOIS SECRETARY GENERAL HALIFA SALLAH MADE A RELEVANT COMMENT IN REFERENCE TO "G6" TO REMIND CONFERENCE THAT; ''We have already reached consensus on mediation efforts and what to do if the incumbent fails to respond. This is why we were surprised by the news that the opposition leaders were at each other’s throat at Raleigh.''. SO WHAT'S WRONG WITH IT AND POSTURE TAKEN BY PDOIS

Kobo, I wish that PDOIS will do away with this theme..

“The Central Committee therefore resolved that it was not prudent to be a part of a brainstorming exercise on the way forward since it had the potential of exposing divisions rather than bridging the strategic and tactical divides on the way forward. ” can be considered as valid reason(s) ”WHY PDOIS WAS NOT IN RALEIGH” that are incontrovertible"

That as a nation in trying times we must engage in brainstorming without conditions... That they shouldn't care more about their individual images and party image to the public at the detriment of the nation... Every Gambian of sound mind is aware there is disagreement and mistrust within the opposition, so why the hell are they so worried about a meeting exposing differences that everyone already knows... You see anything wrong with this picture????

This central committee needs to be dissolved or expanded to include people with differing opinions and not like minded people... That's a club not a political party that aspires to lead a nation... LOL do I have to think like Halifa and Sidia to become a member of PDOIS????


- AGAIN REMINDING TO PLEASE ADDRESS "PDOIS as a party? Try by all means not to directly accuse, offend or mention the persona of Halifa Sallah and Sidia Jatta; i.e. not to personalise it!

- PDOIS ADDRESSED THE RALEIGH CONFERENCE AND CLARIFIED ITS POSITION ALREADY; WITHOUT SHYING AWAY IN TAKING ITS RESPONSIBILITY TO PUT IN PUBLIC DOMAIN HOW TO MOBILISE AGAINST INCUMBENT AND SALVAGE THE NATION!

Edited by - kobo on 07 Jun 2013 06:10:58
Go to Top of Page

dbaldeh

USA
934 Posts

Posted - 07 Jun 2013 :  02:05:00  Show Profile  Visit dbaldeh's Homepage Send dbaldeh a Private Message
Kobo, ok my apology to the admin because I have lot of respect for uncle Momodou and the rest...

I hope that you will also consider this point when you direct your "conspiracy criticism against gainako" I try not to respond to it because we strife from people criticizing us. It only makes us better as as always been maintained..

The rest of your argument no modern person can follow it... You cannot answer questions with questions... I see deep rooted philosophy of reason in you that no human intelligence can change.. its call ego and self righteousness...

We will be able to separate the person of Halifa with PDOIS if PDOIS ceases to take every position Halifa takes... When the Nyangs, the Suwaibou's are freely allowed to speak with Central committee sanctions then we will separate the two...

Thanks but I honestly don't have the time to go line by line with your discussions because they are boring...Kobo.. you need some makeover my friend!

Baldeh,
"Be the change you want to see in the world" Ghandi
Visit http://www.gainako.com for your daily news and politics
Go to Top of Page

kobo



United Kingdom
7765 Posts

Posted - 07 Jun 2013 :  03:14:40  Show Profile Send kobo a Private Message
Originally posted by dbaldeh

Kobo, ok my apology to the admin because I have lot of respect for uncle Momodou and the rest...

THAT'S WHAT AM TALKING ABOUT. THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK? SIMPLY NO RELEVANCE AND COHERENCE TO SUPPORT AN ARGUMENT AND FLOW OF LOGICAL IDEAS

I hope that you will also consider this point when you direct your "conspiracy criticism against gainako" I try not to respond to it because we strife from people criticizing us. It only makes us better as as always been maintained..

THIS COMMENT IS NOT RELEVANT IN THIS TOPIC HERE. ITS APPROPRIATE TO REACT UNDER PROPER TOPIC, FOLLOW THE THREADS AND PROGRESS ON THE ISSUES

The rest of your argument no modern person can follow it... You cannot answer questions with questions... I see deep rooted philosophy of reason in you that no human intelligence can change.. its call ego and self righteousness...

YOU ARE BASHING PDOIS WITHOUT ANY JUSTIFICATION THAT DIDN'T CONVINCE ME, TIRADES WITH WEAK ARGUMENTS AND WHEN CHALLENGE TO SUBSTANTIATE, YOU CHANGE TACTIC BRANDING ME YOUR OWN IMAGE ON "EGO" AND "SELF RIGHTEOUSNESS". LOOK AT THE MIRROR AGAIN AND REFRESH YOURSELF TO FOCUS ON THE ISSUES?

We will be able to separate the person of Halifa with PDOIS if PDOIS ceases to take every position Halifa takes... When the Nyangs, the Suwaibou's are freely allowed to speak with Central committee sanctions then we will separate the two...

- ITS FINE IF YOU DON'T WANT TO PAY HEED AND/OR COGNIZANCE TO PLEASE ADDRESS "PDOIS as a party" Or to "try by all means not to directly accuse, offend or mention the persona of Halifa Sallah; i.e. not to personalise it!"

- ON MY OPINIONS AND COMMENTS PLEASE ADDRESS ME (PERSONALLY) AS A LONE WOLF

- HOPE PDOIS DESK OFFICER HELP TO CLARIFY FURTHER OR STEP IN TO DEFEND ANY RIDICULOUS COMMENT, SMEARING CAMPAIGN, MALICIOUS RHETORIC, VILE SLANDERS, INCLUDING CHARACTER ASSASSINATION OF PDOIS AND ITS LEADERSHIP?

Thanks but I honestly don't have the time to go line by line with your discussions because they are boring...Kobo.. you need some makeover my friend!

- I HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO DEAL WITH YOUR DISJOINTED STATEMENTS IN PIECEMEAL AND ADDRESS THEM ACCORDINGLY; AS PRESENTED IN DISCOURSE

- LEARNING IS A CONTINUOUS PROCESS AND ANYTHING ON POSITIVE NOTE HIGHLY APPRECIATED. HOWEVER THE FOLLOWING REQUIRE YOUR ATTENTION AND FURTHER CLARIFICATION PLEASE
  • Regarding these comments in your own words; "PDOIS explains its Absence in Raleigh???????????????" What do you consider to be at conflict for resolutions (i.e. needs resolving) or what are we require to dilate on, weigh, balance, reconcile and/or bring in harmony "Consensus VS. Compromise"; already in gambia-l exchange forum and originally forwarded by you; WITHOUT ANYTHING FRUITFUL IN THAT DISCOURSE EXCEPT THE USUAL BANTER BETWEEN "PDOISARDS" Vs "UDPITES" PARTISANSHIP AND WITTICISM?

  • You stated that " you (I) don't agree that PDOIS is the only Party with sound ideas on clarifying efforts of the opposition... " BUT PLEASE REFER ME UDP, NRP, GMC, PPP OR GPDP PROPOSALS ON RALEIGH CONFERENCE OR ANYTHING PUT ON TABLE (AVAILABLE IN PUBLIC DORMAIN); CLEAR-CUT, SPECIFIC AND ATTAINABLE; WELL DOCUMENTED AND ORGANISED AS PDOIS, FOR THE RALEIGH CONFERENCE; WITHOUT PUTTING EMPHASIS ON "BRAINSTORMING EXERCISE" BUT "PRAGMATISM" AND/OR ACTION ORIENTED CONDUCT?

Thanks!

Edited by - kobo on 07 Jun 2013 22:25:54
Go to Top of Page

kobo



United Kingdom
7765 Posts

Posted - 07 Jun 2013 :  06:48:18  Show Profile Send kobo a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by kobo

THE DISCOURSE HAS TOOK A NEW DIMENSION WITH THIS CRITICAL ARTICLE (COMMENTS & OPINION) FROM A PDOIS STALWART MILITANT AND DIASPORA PILLAR (USA LEADER). WHAT A BEAUTY FOR "EVERYONE RIGHT OF OPINION"; AGREE OR TO DISAGREE UNDER NORMS OF "DEMOCRACY" AND "FREEDOM OF SPEECH"

1. MAAFANTA.COM NEWS;

PDOIS Must Not Have Missed Raleigh by Modou Nyang

"The absence of PDOIS at the Raleigh conference in the weekend of 17th to 19th of May to engage interested Gambians on the way out of the political mess our country is embroiled into was a mistake that must not have happened. PDOIS (People’s Democratic Organization for Independence and Socialism), is the one party in the Gambia that since its emergence on our country’s political scene, that have been on the forefront of every single happening of national concern and struggle for the freedom and development of our people. As a result, abstaining to confer with fellow citizens notwithstanding the differences of views and opinions on the modalities to the roadmap for the liberation of our country may be, is not the PDOIS way and must not be repeated. PDOIS never shies away from engaging in the discourse for the way forward for our country and people, singularly because of its clarity of vision and mission to the path to salvage and put our country on the road to development. Therefore, missing out in Raleigh denied the party the chance and opportunity to yet again put forth its views before an interested party....."

More full information

2. SAME ARTICLE FEATURED BY KIBAARO NEWS AS;



3 MAAFANTA.COM "Prudence dictates that you weigh your words before putting them down" - "Halipha Sallah warns Modou Nyang";

quote:
"It was a conference to search together for answers and not to direct angry invectives against each other. It should have been a unifying conference not a divisive one. It is unfortunate that you have used the language you did to interrogate what Mr Ousianou Darbo said. We would not use such a language against a person who has not given us any cause to do so. You as a Gambian citizen are entitled to the way you view things and make use of the English language. Prudence dictates that you weigh your words before putting them down." by Halifa Sallah PDOIS Secretary General

Edited by - kobo on 07 Jun 2013 19:31:26
Go to Top of Page

kobo



United Kingdom
7765 Posts

Posted - 07 Jun 2013 :  22:19:32  Show Profile Send kobo a Private Message
1.FOROYAA NEWS:EDITORIAL;

GAMBIANS IN THE DIASPORA ORGANISING CONFERENCES ON THE FUTURE OF THE COUNTRY

"Tens of thousands of Gambians are living in the Diaspora. Some had gone into exile since the days of the first Republic and had never been able to come back. Others went into exile in the days of the second Republic and are still unable to come back. Some are there in search of greener pastures and have built families and cannot come right away. Some do come and go....

The fact that meetings have been held in the US and others are scheduled for Stockholm confirms that homecoming is becoming uppermost in the minds of the Gambians abroad. Once a person aims to come home one would undoubtedly be interested in finding out and contemplating what type of home one is to come back to if one comes back now and what type of home one would want to come back to if one had ones choice.

The Constitution and the election laws give Gambians in the Diaspora the right to be registered as voters and to vote.

They may wish to debate on the laws and inform themselves thoroughly on the content and then draw resolutions on what steps to take to ensure their participation in future elections.

They could also receive reports on the operation of parties in the country and assess the ground and pass resolution on how to contribute to make it level for multi party contest...

These concerns should serve as a bridge for Gambians in the Diaspora to meet under a climate of serenity, mutual trust and respect to discuss the real situation in the country and how to make a difference...."

SOURCE: More Full Information here

2. MAAFANTA.COM;

3. RELATED BANTABA TOPICS:

Edited by - kobo on 07 Jun 2013 22:51:09
Go to Top of Page

kobo



United Kingdom
7765 Posts

Posted - 08 Jun 2013 :  22:14:00  Show Profile Send kobo a Private Message
@dBaldeh REQUIRE YOUR ATTENTION AND FURTHER CLARIFICATION PLEASE
  • Regarding these comments in your own words; "PDOIS explains its Absence in Raleigh???????????????" What do you consider to be at conflict for resolutions (i.e. needs resolving) or what are we require to dilate on, weigh, balance, reconcile and/or bring in harmony "Consensus VS. Compromise"; already in gambia-l exchange forum and originally forwarded by you; WITHOUT ANYTHING FRUITFUL IN THAT DISCOURSE EXCEPT THE USUAL BANTER BETWEEN "PDOISARDS" Vs "UDPITES" PARTISANSHIP AND WITTICISM?

  • You stated that " you (I) don't agree that PDOIS is the only Party with sound ideas on clarifying efforts of the opposition... " BUT PLEASE REFER ME UDP, NRP, GMC, PPP OR GPDP PROPOSALS ON RALEIGH CONFERENCE OR ANYTHING PUT ON TABLE (AVAILABLE IN PUBLIC DORMAIN); CLEAR-CUT, SPECIFIC AND ATTAINABLE; WELL DOCUMENTED AND ORGANISED AS PDOIS, FOR THE RALEIGH CONFERENCE; WITHOUT PUTTING EMPHASIS ON "BRAINSTORMING EXERCISE" BUT "PRAGMATISM", GOOD ACTION PLAN, A CLEAR ROAD MAP AND/OR ACTION ORIENTED CONDUCT?

    IN SIMPLE TERMS; WHAT DID THE PARTIES THAT ATTENDED RALEIGH PUT ON TABLE AS ITS PROPOSALS AND WAY FORWARD RESPECTIVELY? DID YOU GATHER ANYTHING FROM OTHER OPPOSITION PARTIES; AS CLEAR-CUT AS PDOIS? FORWARD THE "SOUND IDEAS" FROM OTHER OPPOSITION PARTIES ON THE RALEIGH CONFERENCE


  • QUOTING KARAMBA TOURAY PROMOTING THE RALEIGH CONFERENCE (here);
    • "Consequently, the May gathering is the first time a concerted effort is being made to bring every constituency to sit at the table and together craft the way forward. The invitees include representatives of political parties, civil society organisations, journalists, individual activists, and unaffiliated citizens. The idea is to harness and aggregate what each constituency brings table to produce a specific action plan that we can all support and follow through. This strategy builds on earlier attempts which essentially put the fate of the nation in the hands of a handful of politicians and when that plan went awry it doomed years of hard work. The diverse and broad base nature of the undertaking would afford each constituency an opportunity to have their issues amplified by the whole group."

    • " Our struggle needs all our people, the wise, the humble, the determined, the discouraged because we are the change we seek."

    • "You can help the struggle quietly if that is what suits you and like liberation struggles the world over every individual effort counts a great deal."

    SIMILARLY QUOTING GMC LEADER LAWYER MAI FATTY'S SOLIDARITY MESSAGE FROM THE GMC LETTER TO THE ORGANISERS AND PARTICIPANTS AT THE RALEIGH CONFERENCE (here);
    • "Mr. Chairman, there is only one objective that merits exclusive focus: achieving total political change in our country. This effort must be championed and led by Gambians."

    • "Here in Raleigh, we must pull our own weight and depend on it. We must make the necessary sacrifices ourselves, for no one shall fight our battle for us. By now, we must come to the inevitable realization that only we ourselves shall get the job, and we must assume that mindset supported by the right vision with targeted, pragmatic, result-oriented actions.".."This is time for action."

    • "In charting a way forward, it must be understood and appreciated that your natural partner is the internal opposition on the ground. Let me trumpet it and clear here that there can be no successful political transformation that alienates the internal opposition, and by this I mean the opposition Parties on the ground. The international community will not open up to serious dialogue on the future of our country in any initiatives that set to render the internal opposition secondary. I know this."

    • "For us to succeed, the Diaspora and the internal opposition on the ground must embrace each other, complimenting each other. We cannot succeed by mutual antagonism, mistrust, confrontation and competition.There was never a time, and there will not be a time during the struggle to cast aspersions on the internal opposition. The Gambian opposition, like the Diaspora reflects the nature of The Gambian society. We are what you are, so let us look inward. Yet there is hope. This Conference is intended to enable us banish negative values, and in their place enthrone a culture of cooperation and solidarity – working together in a united, concerted action as one entity, one people to deliver change to our citizens."

    • "On the sensitive, but elusive issue of a united opposition on the ground, this is truly vital. It is the unanimous conviction of all stakeholders in the struggle for the opposition parties to unite under a single leadership. Speaking for our Alliance, we share this conviction."

    • "Lastly, our view of a successful conference is one that sets up an umbrella entity with the primary objective of supporting the capacity of the internal opposition as well empowering their structures on the ground. The notion of a conference to empower a diaspora entity as the face and soul of the struggle seeking the blessing of the internal opposition leadership to facilitate the same would be an unrealistic expectation. Anything that has the potential to split us into them and us should not find its way either directly or subtly in our deliberations or Resolutions. Regular contacts, consultation and coordination based on mutual respect, should dictate dealings between both sides."

  • 1. PLEASE BE REMINDED ON "WHY PDOIS WAS NOT IN RALEIGH?" ITS CONSIDERATION, DECISION, POSITION, RESOLUTIONS AND PROPOSALS FROM SALIENT QUOTES BELOW;

    "The PDOIS received a letter from the organisers of the Raleigh Conference inviting the Secretary General of PDOIS to a Conference to be held in Raleigh North Carolina from the 18th to 20th May aimed at deliberating on strategies and tactics on how to effect peaceful change in the Gambia."

    "After a careful review of your invitation it is deemed wise, right and proper to propose a different approach.

    It is proposed that the May meeting be transformed into a dialogue between Gambians of all political shades resident abroad with a view to reaching external consensus on the way forward.

    The resolutions could then be forwarded to the political parties at home for review in preparation for a dialogue between the political parties and the Diaspora which could be held at a later date."

    "Each political party would have adequate time to address the meeting and put its proposal across to promote consensus building."

    "It is important to convey to you that PDOIS is already part of an initiative which requests for the mediation of Reverend Jesse Jackson. We would like to exhaust this initiative in order to draw final lessons on what strategy and tactics we are to adopt to address the issue of democratic change in the Gambia. It is our humble opinion that it is irrational to travel across continents just to deliver such a message."

    "The Central Committee therefore resolved that it was not prudent to be a part of a brainstorming exercise on the way forward since it had the potential of exposing divisions rather than bridging the strategic and tactical divides on the way forward."


    2. THAT PDOIS FURTHER CLARIFIED ITS RESOLUTIONS FROM PDOIS (HALIFA) RESPONSE TO D.A JAWO; REVIEWED EVERY DETAIL UNDER 1. AND MAINTAINED SAME STANCE THAT;

    PDOIS stated that they (PDOIS) "received the invitation of the organisers we (PDOIS) did applaud their initiative."

    "The Central Committee of PDOIS met to review the invitation and came to the conclusion that two preliminary steps are necessary before such a meeting could take place in a manner that would yield the desired results of a national consensus on strategies and tactics for peaceful political change."

    PDOIS REMINED THE CONFERENCE THAT "First and foremost, the opposition at home had to arrive at a consensus on the way forward at the meeting or convey the wrong impression that they are so divided that they could not forge a United Front for Democratic change. "

    "Secondly, the Diaspora also had to meet and develop a consensus on the way forward failing which opinions could be so divided at the meeting that the way forward could become illusive."

    "Thirdly, we (PDOIS) envisaged that once the two consensuses are independently built the holding of a joint Diaspora–Opposition meeting to harmonise them into a National consensus would become feasible after the consensus at the Diaspora meeting is circulated and reviewed by each opposition party and discussion held among them reach a consensus before the National Conference. "

    "However in order to promote ownership of the process and engender a more formal arrangement for consensus building, we proposed for the Diaspora to meet and work out a consensus, the content of which would be conveyed to the political parties at home for review and decisions taken by their own organs in line with their party constitutions."

    PDOIS "further proposed that after taking their individual party positions on any proposal from the diaspora political parties at home could meet to discuss their party positions and form a consensus which shall then be followed by a Diaspora – opposition meeting that would entirely focus on concrete proposals for a consensus on the way to facilitate electoral reform or effect democratic change if proposals for reforms are rejected."

    "In this way no parochial difference would be entertained and the deliberations would be devoted solely on National consensus building."

    "Hence it is clear to all that we (PDOIS) have not only endorsed consensus building but have concretely stated how it could be done in a climate of serenity and sobriety, free from any acrimony and hair-splitting wrangling over issues that have no national relevance, as befits those who aim to engage in the most important task of our times, that of building a country fit for a sovereign, free , prosperous and dignified citizen to live in."

    "Hence the other parties too should now focus on telling the people what they intend to do differently from the existing ruling party to enhance liberty and prosperity."

    That "the resolutions of the conference.. (should) harmonized the objectives, strategies and tactics on how to bring Democratic change in the Gambia."

    PDOIS acknowledge "What is achieved is to start a consensus building process. The raw material for National consensus building is yet to be available. The organizers have made a good start just as we (PDOIS) predicted. Hence what you (D.A.Jawo amongst other detractors) should be calling or is the continuity of a dialogue and not the embracing of a finish product."

    3. AGAIN PLEASE BE REMINDED THAT FOR THE RALEIGH CONFERENCE PDOIS ACKNOWLEDGE AND ENDORSED THESE; IN LINE WITH WHAT PDOIS IS KNOWN FOR ITS ADVOCACY ON IDEALS OF "DEMOCRACY"; ESPECIALLY "the idea of popular sovereignty expressed by citizens" MEETING AT RALEIGH TOGETHER ON "COMMON PLATFORM" FOR A "COMMON GOAL"

    "Political practitioners and analysts should focus on the people if they want to understand the way forward for the Gambia."

    "Political leaders are not putting ropes on the necks of the people."

    "In most cases the pollsters are in a better position to determine the prospects of the leaders in politics than they themselves. It is the attitude of the people that should breed hope or hopelessness."

    "It is very clear that the people are in charge."

    "What they are looking for are leaders they could trust. The future is bright. No one could throw dust in the eyes of the people any more."

    "Neither the unity of the opposition nor its disunity is an obstacle or asset for change"

    "The change in Banjul is a clear indication that the future of this country lies in the hands of the people."

    "It is our humble opinion that every sovereign Gambian has an equal right to be the architect of our destiny. We could argue over strategy and tactics but should respect each person’s right to participate in determining the outcome."

    "While trusting that you will give due regard to our proposal, please allow us, dear compatriots, to convey to you the assurance of our highest consideration."


Thanks!

Edited by - kobo on 09 Jun 2013 09:59:09
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
| More
Jump To:
Bantaba in Cyberspace © 2005-2024 Nijii Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.23 seconds. User Policy, Privacy & Disclaimer | Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.06