Bantaba in Cyberspace
Bantaba in Cyberspace
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ | Invite a friend
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Politics Forum
 Politics: Gambian politics
 Khalifa Bojang RE ARRESTED
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
| More
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  


9985 Posts

Posted - 09 Feb 2019 :  21:58:06  Show Profile Send toubab1020 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Khalifa Bojang was freed on a single charge of possession of prohibited drugs for the purpose of drug trafficking after his lawyer, Ida Drameh made a submission of ‘no case to answer’.

However, the prosecution, FM Colley said the Drug Law Enforcement Agency, Gambia, DLEAG, was going to appeal the decision and asked the court to order for Mr Bojang to be remanded in custody.

But the magistrate refused the request and set Mr Bojang, free, stating: “The application made by the prosecution is hereby dismissed. The accused must be set at liberty forthwith. The accused, an innocent man has been set at liberty whose right is protected and entrenched under the 1997 Constitution. I must say that I am not bound to follow the decisions of my learned colleagues as they were merely persuasive.”

However when Mr Bojang stepped out of the courtroom, the agents pounced on him in the court premises while he was standing by his lawyer. His lawyer unsuccessfully demanded his release and said she will take action against the officers and she took photographs of the melee involving her client.

Mr Bojang was arrested in 2012 and put on trial for being in possession of 85kg, 500g of Cannabis sativa. He pleaded not guilty. He was set free after the magistrate ruled that the prosecution did not establish that the accused was in possession of the four bags containing suspected cannabis. “I believed that the evidences were debunked and further discredited under cross-examination. The evidence is loaded with doubts that I can’t resolve. I cannot convict the accused on the grounds that the evidence of [some prosecution witnesses] are unreliable. The prosecution has not made their case against the accused to sufficiently require him to enter defence.”
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
| More
Jump To:
Bantaba in Cyberspace © 2005-2019 Nijii Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.05 seconds. User Policy, Privacy & Disclaimer | Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.06